When I saw this picture I was reminded of a Seinfeld episode where Jerry was doing one of his standup comedy routines and talking about getting the toe. He said something like getting that is way worse than getting the finger because giving the finger is easy; you just have to take your hand off the steering wheel and flip it. But the toe you’d have to take off your shoe and sock and lift your foot up to the window. That’s a lot of effort to flip someone off. If you ever get the toe you know you’ve really done something bad. I think Seinfeld could’ve been right on the money with that one. What do you think? Would you be more offended if you got the toe rather than the finger… or would you think it was just too damn funny for words?
Is it just me or do the shadows of these two cup totally look like a pair of boobs? And by the looks of those nipples it would appear chilly in that room. That’s weird, all of the sudden I feel like having a cup of tea.
The husband says to his wife as their dog comes walking into the living-room carrying a dildo in its mouth, “hey honey, looks the dog’s got your dildo. Isn’t that funny?”
This cake actually reminded me of that movie Knocked Up. If you haven’t seen it you can pretty much figure out what it’s about from the title … and this cake kinda offers a crucial hint as well.
Any thoughts on what kind of party this cake was intended for? I was thinking for a guy who is having a bachelor party weekend and the previous night he had drunken sex with the pizza delivery guy who he thought was a really ugly female stripper but was too drunk to remember and this cake was the best way for his friends to break the news to him it was actually a dude who was just delivering a pizza.
Here’s a funny story about how a Christian group in San Diego is offended by the new old Starbucks logo featuring a naked woman. Personally I don’t see what the problem is. I think more corporate logos should feature naked women … and maybe they would if it wasn’t for people like this. Star Tribune says:
Seems that one person’s smut is another person’s morning latte. A Christian group based in San Diego found grounds for outrage over the new retro-style logo for Starbucks Coffee. The Resistance says the new image “has a naked woman on it with her legs spread like a prostitute,” Mark Dice, founder of the group, said in a news release. “Need I say more? It’s extremely poor taste, and the company might as well call themselves Slutbucks.” The group, which claims more than 3,000 members nationwide and has found a place on the fringe advancing various conspiracy theories, is calling for a national boycott of the coffee-selling giant.
I have four words for these idiots: get a fucking life. And I think Slutbucks would actually be an excellent idea. Instead of just patiently waiting for your drink to be made … you could instead get a blowjob while you wait.
